Thursday, July 21, 2011

Franking in Sarnia-Lambton to Continue - Should It Be Stopped?

C Is For Cinderella Stamp
Creative Commons License photo credit: cliff1066™


More franking concerns continue. In Sarnia Ontario, also know as the chemical valley many plants are dependent on the availability of natural gas for raw chemical production. With such a high demand for cheap natural gas fracking seems to make sense for increasing availability. The problem with this is the current unknown of consequences of franking an the exposure to radiation and toxic chemicals. Below is the expand report of the concerns of the Sarnia and Lambton county representatives.

stopfrackingontario wrote:

Chemical Valley industries are arranging to use shale gas supplies that very likely could be contaminated with radon, given how these gas feedstocks are extracted through fracking — a technique that is used to retrieve gas from shale rock located very deep underground. Two Texas companies have agreed to send this shale gas from the northeastern United States to the Nova Chemical plant in Sarnia, and there is wider industry support for these imports of gas from fracking.

For the sake of the health and safety of the residents of Sarnia-Lambton — and others around the region — it is important that we apply the precautionary principle to this issue. We should assume that shale gas could come with radon contamination, if we cannot prove otherwise.

This gas is from shale that often contains significant quantities of uranium, as well as the products of its radioactive decay, including radium and radon, a colourless, odourless, and intensely radioactive gas. Because it is common in many rock formations throughout North America and elsewhere, radon is responsible for most of our daily exposure to damaging radiation. Radon gas that seeps up from subterranean rock formations often accumulates in basements — sometimes resulting in dangerous levels. Lung cancer caused by breathing radon contaminated air already is estimated to cause 25,000 deaths per year in the United States alone and is the second most frequent cause of lung cancer, after cigarette smoking.

 

Top Acronyms List

This is worth bookmarking.

WTFrack.org wrote:



























Friday, July 15, 2011




 

What Do all of Those Fracronyms Mean?





A HELPFUL RESOURCE WHEN READING TECHNICA





















Friday, July 15, 2011

Gulf Oill Spill Water Sample Explodes 1 Year Later

This is a News video reporting the water quality from different locations in and around the gulf. Samples were taken from populated beaches with children and pets. Not one sample was under the safe ppm levels. Some samples were 10 times greater then the regulated threshold. The scary part was one of the samples actuallly exploded in the lab while it was being tested.

Larry wrote:

Recently, a News5 investigation collected samples from multiple beaches in and around the Gulf region. Samples were taken in areas where kids were playing and swimming. The results were absolutely terrifying. The Intel Hub has heavily documented the Gulf Disaster and this is just another startling revelation in a long line of horrors coming out of the Gulf. What British Petroleum has done is at the very least criminal neglect, if not premeditated chemical rape. Most of the people working for BP have vigorously worked to contain the spill, not knowing that their bosses have done just about everything backwards, with little to regard for human life. Read Full Article – theintelhub.com Kindra Arnesen on Intel Hub Radio www.youtube.com Original Video www.youtube.com

 

 


Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Offshore Drilling Plan Stalled Over Who Is Getting Paid?

As the new offshore drilling plans go through the senate it is interesting to see that more problem are arising over the money aspect then over the environmental impact. Offshore drilling is a very viable oil supply strategy for the US, but not having out ducks in a row to stratgey drilling is another accident waiting to happen. Let's see some proactive regulations based on prevention and saftey and not just dollars.

Jennifer Dlouhy wrote:

Controversy over whether to give states a greater share of federal revenues for offshore drilling near their coasts is stalling oil and gas legislation in the Senate.

The measure by Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, aims to stiffen oversight of offshore drilling and would codify a reorganization of the federal agency that polices oil and gas exploration on the outer continental shelf.

Although the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee was set to debate and vote on the legislation this Thursday, the bill was left off a just-issued agenda for the meeting.

Murkowski said the major holdup is the revenue sharing proposal. A top priority for Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., and other coastal senators, the proposal is closer than ever to securing enough votes to be added to the offshore drilling legislation and make it out of the committee — over the objections of some panel Democrats, including Bingaman, the chairman.

Murkowski said there has been major “headway made in just educating people about the value of it.”

Yme platform
Creative Commons License photo credit: L.C.Nøttaasen

Bob Henderson Want To Drill On The Land He Once Fought To Protect

Huffington Post News:

WHITTIER, Calif. -- Whittier city official Bob Henderson has spent three decades, by his own account, helping rescue vast expanses of this hilly preserve from continued drilling by oil companies. As head of the conservation authority, his responsibility has been to protect the land.

But now, with oil hovering around $100 a barrel, the same man who led the charge to save the 1,290-acre Whittier Wilderness Preserve is interested in drilling there. Proponents believe Whittier could get as much as $177 million a year in oil revenues by using new technology that they say will only disturb 7 acres of the vast Whittier Hills. The proposal has bitterly divided this Los Angeles suburb that was founded by Quakers in the late 19th century, a religion with a deep commitment to protecting the environment.


Henderson, who continues to think of himself as a conservationist, said he's surprised to find himself leaning toward drilling.

"It's not that I've decided to destroy the preserve," he said. "What I do believe in very strongly is that you've got to be open and alert to help the habitat and the city. This has the potential to contribute millions of dollars to the preservation effort and in making sure the preserve is viable in the long run.

Drilling opponents don't see their former hero, or his current argument, in such nuanced light. They worry that once drilling is allowed in one spot future city council members could approve it elsewhere on the preserve.